Things keep getting worse at the Delhi and District
Cricket Association (DDCA) and it seems relationships don’t last long and can
change in a short period. Tuesday saw another piece of drama. A letter written
by sports working committee convenor Mr Vinod Tihara attacks association and
BCCI vice-president Mr CK Khanna and promises to save the DDCA employees from
him.
Mr Tihara wrote in his letter that the Mr Khanna has been
ruling DDCA for the last 33 years and has been manipulating and resorting to
illegal means and acts to get himself elected.
Mr Tihara further mentions, “I have initiated the
beginning of the end of the rule of CK Khanna and would not rest till he is
taken to Tihar Jail with full band baaza”.
It is surprising how Mr Tihara has suddenly got inimical to
Mr Khanna. Till last year he was his best friend. In fact, when former
cricketer Mr Kirti Azad raised the issue during one of the elections, he
pointed out the nexus between Mr Tihara and Mr Khanna. In fact, it is common knowledge
at DDCA Mr Khanna has helped Mr Tihara win elections over a number of years.
For those frequenting the DDCA, Mr Tihara was often seen in his room.
So how come the two have fallen out and Mr Tihara become
the “Jaani Dushman’ of Mr Khanna. From “Ye dosti hum nahi chhodenge”, the song
has become “Main tera dushman, dushman too mera...”.
The crux of the issue my friends are the forthcoming
sports working committee elections as you must have known while reading this
blog. Mr Tihara has become the key enemy of Mr Khanna as it is known that the
latter is not backing him this time.
To give you an idea of the timeline of the events that
has led to this enmity:
On June 13 a resolution was passed to set the procedure for
elections in motion. DDCA director Mr Ajay Sharma proposed it whereas Mr Ashok
Sharma, another director seconded it.
On June 17, a meeting was called where former test
cricketer Mr Chetan Chauhan, Mr CK Khanna and DDCA treasurer Mr Ravindra
Manchanda were present. Mr Sunil Dev, the fourth key person, although asked to
come didn’t attend the meeting. Mr Dev is a key ally of Mr Tihara. At the meeting,
it was decided that KS Mohi, a retired judge would be appointed the election
officer.
On June 18, a letter was despatched to Mr Mohi and he
showed his receiving on the very same day.
On June 19, Mr Tihara approached the Tees Hazari Courts contesting
that the resolutions are all illegal as the directors’ term had already expired
on November 30, 2014.
On June 22, the court asked to seal the register where it
was mentioned that Mr Mohi would be the election officer and proposals for elections
were set up. Mr Tihara had claimed that the appointments were done on
back-date, that is after he had filed a case on June 19.
However, Mr Ashok Sharma has claimed that the case filed
on June 19 already has the contentious papers. “If the appointment paper and
the election resolution is already there with the June 19 case, how is it
possible that changes could be made on back-date. They are bluffing and fooling
everyone. They just want to hang this around for the next year or year and a
half and stay in charge of sports committee.”
The next date of hearing is June 29. Surely
sparks will fly till then. The latest being an allegation of Mr Tihara that Mr
Khanna and his friends had arranged goons to beat up two members of his sports
working committee – Mr Anil Mishra and Mr Padam Chauhan. Delhi Cricket will
talk about it in the next post as much drama is likely to happen on Wednesday
evening over these allegations.
Have guts and take a response from others in the DDCA as well. Go beyond the Khanna's and the Ashok Sharma's of DDCA. There are others including Vinod Tihara the person who took the DDCA to court. Go and have guts to speak to him to write about the matter.
ReplyDeleteAs a journalist learn to use the word "alleged" and avoid using stuff like on June 17 a meeting was called. Open your faculties to realise that the committee never met. To know it better go and talk to the DDCA President, Sports Secretary and get their views who would tell you that even they were kept in dark about the SWC elections and appointment of Election Officer.
ReplyDelete